Ong Bak 2 – Magnet Releasing, 2008. Directed by Tony Jaa and Panna Rittikrai.
I had pretty high expectations going into Ong Bak 2 which is why I made sure to catch the last screening before it left theaters after its brief three week run. The first Ong Bak was a great return to old school kung fu movies with a scant story, but a great variety of action. Tom Yum Goong’s story (whether you watched the uncut version or the slimmed down American version) was pretty awful, but did you care when Tony Jaa is fighting in every other scene?
Story – (This section will be inordinately long because it’s fun to talk about how badly it’s done. If you don’t care then skip to the “Action” section) Abandoning the “Where’s my Buddha head!?” or “Where’s my elephant!?” story structure of the first films, Ong Bak 2’s story is a far more ambitious period revenge story. Revenge stories in martial arts films are pretty standard fare so how did they mess it up so badly? Permit me to illustrate with a stream of consciousness description to the progression of the story. It should give you a good idea of the problems with the story in this film.
A boy is being carried on horseback fleeing soldiers shooting at him with bows and arrows. The rider drops him for his safety before he and his horse are riddled with arrows. The boy is taken to a village with nasty looking men. A Frankenstein looking guy throws him into a pit of muddy water where he’s forced to duke it out with a crocodile. A bearded man intently watches and decides to save the boy along with his friends who all have unique martial arts skills and weapons. These men are the leaders of a group of bandits.

KISSSSS MEEEE!!!
Boy is trained in martial arts of all types and grows up to become total badass and seemingly invincible Tony Jaa. The Bearded man passes the mantle onto Tony Jaa who will now be the leader on raids. Wait, what? Why is Tony Jaa now looking evil and killing people and stealing their stuff while looking evil? Am I supposed to cheer him on?

Here's the villain of the film... no wait that's Tony Jaa.
We see Frankenstein guy again and this time he’s selling slaves. Tony Jaa puts a stop to it and defeats the bad men with a kind of Drunken Boxing. He frees the slaves. Wait, you alternate between being evil and being good?
Now we see flashbacks to his training where he prays diligently and talks about wanting to learn martial arts so he can protect himself and his friends. That fits with freeing the slaves, but right before that you were killing people and stealing their stuff. Isn’t this a bit hypocritical? Oh by the way, when he was a boy he went to a dance school where he met a girl and had a silly dance off with a guy (Dirty Balls from Ong Bak 1) and as he leaves the girl in tears he gives her a bracelet with bells on it.
On with the story. Bearded man wants to make Tony Jaa the leader but he sees he still has revenge in his heart. Oh, I guess all this time he had revenge in his mind, could’ve told us sooner because now it’s probably more than halfway through the movie by now. In another flashback some man in dark robes killed his father at the behest of some evil leader. Now we’re caught up on his desire for revenge.

We get it... we get it... Thai dance is beautiful... now fight some more!
[Insert loooooong dance scene with Tony Jaa's childhood friend who we connect because she still wears the bracelet] [Insert another looooong dance scene with a decidedly more martial arts twist to it] [Insert girl and evil leader exchanging looks] [Insert girl and evil leader exchanging looks] [Insert girl and evil leader exchanging looks] [Insert girl and evil leader exchanging looks] [Insert girl and evil leader exchanging looks] OMG Tony Jaa threw explosives and is now killing people and alternately slashing the evil leader with a sword!

Oh no I think I see dust on the lens! Tony stop looking at the camera!
Tony Jaa flees! Wait, what about the girl? Oh well.
Tony Jaa returns to the bandit village an is attacked by a robust cast of diverse martial artists in black robes wielding lots of different weapons. End with a fight with Tony Jaa and some weird boss character that makes crow noises and has weird bird-like ticks. Tony Jaa loses, bird man disappears for the rest of the movie. [SPOILER ALERT] Evil leader man and his soldiers surround Tony Jaa, turns out he was wearing armor the entire time and is still alive! Also, the Bearded man was the man who killed Tony Jaa’s father so they duel and Tony Jaa wins. Evil leader orders Tony Jaa tortured then some abrupt narration about Tony Jaa having bad karma and not being able to escape it. Cut to Tony Jaa with beard standing in front of… OMG IT’S THE ONG BAK HEAD FROM THE FIRST MOVIE!! Roll credits.
I probably just talked about the story of Ong Bak 2 more than all the other reviews on the internet do combined. You think in kung fu movies that the story doesn’t really matter at all but it kinda sorta does. The action scenes in Ong Bak 2 are great and hard hitting, but doesn’t it feel better when you REALLY want the protagonist to kick the crap out of the other guy? People always say they’re not going to the movie for the story, but we still need enough story that we root for the hero. In Ong Bak 1 we REALLY want Tony Jaa to beat up some of the villains whether it’s for beating up helpless people, breaking their arms etc.

I pray I don't knee you in the face TOO hard.
The problem in Ong Bak 2 is from one scene to the next the protagonist goes back and forth between seeming evil to benevolent. So by the time the revenge plot is finally revealed halfway through the movie we’re really not sympathizing with him.
Sometimes I find myself thinking that a movie could be shorter, but never has it been so clear which parts should be cut out as when I was watching Ong Bak 2. The entire subplot with his childhood friend could easily be cut out because it’s never resolved in any way shape or form nor does it add anything to his character. Also if they cut out the raid scene where he’s killing and robbing that would make the character more consistent and make him more sympathetic.
Action – Enough talk about plot let’s get down to the action. The action is excellent and shot with well framed shots that allow you to see all the action and smoothly edited so your eye never gets lost.
The first action scene is the bandits fighting in their various styles. This scene is more like a taste of things to come since no one in here is really a star. Most of them have a few good moves before they cut to the next person. A nice variety of weapons from spear, katana, metal rings and knives.

I wear my shawl thus so I can take it off like this!
The first real scene where Tony Jaa gets to show his chops is during a series of trials where he fights with a Japanese katana which has a lot of stances and close up shots on hand grips you usually see in samurai films. Next is a very hard Southern style Chinese kung fu fight with very deep rooted stances and hard strikes. It’s cool to see Tony Jaa doing more Chinese style kung fu with its pretty low stances. Finally a fight which looks more like Tony Jaa’s typical Muay Thai style with lots of grappling and submission holds mixed in. These fights are good, but still also just a sample of what’s to come. His final trial is a sort of “Empire Strikes Back” cave scene against a feral woman which is an okay scene but seems more focused on the woman growling like a lion and showing her fangs.

What's in there? Only what you take with you.
Later we have the aforementioned raid scene where Tony Jaa acts all evil and stuff. There’s some quick hand to hand, sword fighting and spear fighting, but mostly this scene isn’t entirely about cool choreography. Plus, he’s being evil in this scene so it wouldn’t really be fitting for you to cheer him on. First rule of writing a hero character, don’t make him beat up and kill innocent civilians!
Next up is Tony Jaa’s take on drunken boxing which he actually spends mostly on the ground kicking/breaking knees and falling on people elbowing them in the back of the head. While nothing yet has topped Jackie Chan’s Drunken Master II this scene is fun to watch because it’s a different take focused more on really hard hits and broken bones. This is the first scene where we get a good amount of Tony Jaa’s brutal style. He’s not quite as evil in this scene because he’s freeing slaves but he still looks pretty evil.

Ow
After what’s probably the longest stretch without any fighting we have Tony Jaa’s masked dance/kung fu performance which is fun to watch, but all I could think of at the time was how he was just wasting time before he tries to kill the Evil leader who isn’t even really watching his show. He has some knife and sword fighting, but this scene isn’t about the choreography.

Fighting two people at the same time is hard...
Finally we get to the final fifteen minute fight scene. This is where Tony Jaa really just amps it up and shows everything he can do. He alternates between sword and sheath on rope, three-sectioned staff, blade and string, more swords, elephant (yes elephant) and good old hand to hand combat. I think the hand to hand versus two fighters is where I really started making sure I didn’t miss any details because this fight has the longest takes and is very impressive. While I think Jackie Chan makes fighting multiple guys look the best, this is still a very good fight.

Why yes, I do fight with elephants. What do you fight with?
It’s interesting to contrast Tony Jaa and Jet Li’s use of three-sectioned staff. Tony Jaa has his flourishes to be sure, but for the most part it’s very direct. Older Hong Kong films usually focus more on the fight looking pretty, where as Thai action seems to focus more on being brutally efficient. Both are fun to watch in their own way so it’s nice to have the variety.
I’ve read some reviews of this movie that say the movie speeds the fights up too much, but after watching it again I don’t think they sped the movements up at all. The only thing I think that could give that impression is it looks like they might’ve used a camera with smaller shutter which gives a unique kind of motion a la “Saving Private Ryan” or the Mexico scenes in “Traffic.” My kung fu teacher is in his mid 40s and watching his movements are like watching a movie so it’s not hard to believe that someone in his 30s could move as fast or faster.

All sword fighting scenes are cooler with sparks!
I also give credit to the way the film was shot and edited. When they aren’t using long takes the editing is very smooth and precise from one motion to the next. The shots are framed such that you can see everything that’s going on and the use of slow motion is used well to give maximum impact for the big hits (watch closely Zack Snyder, this is how it’s done). The only bit of slow motion when they let me down was a slow motion jump he makes to escape a shack full of explosives… that doesn’t explode. That aside, after watching Chocolate it feels good to watch a kung fu movie which knows how to best show off the skills of its star.
Final Thoughts – Recommended. I wish the story was more interesting, but the action makes up for it in the end. The production design is also very good, they clearly spent a lot more money making this film with its sets and costumes. It looks like they could’ve just filmed in villages they found in Thailand (maybe they did?).
Tony Jaa continues to impress, let’s just hope in the future he has some smarter writers and story editors. Or who knows? Maybe Ong Bak 3 will tie up loose ends that they didn’t get to here. As long as he continues to use the same action directors then we can expect more good things to come from him in the future.


















Some examples of trailers that use music from the actual film score are 










